The primary “official” classification system currently is the Vox-ATypI system. Sets film in 1920’s uses typeface from 1975. However, for the reasons given above, I believe there is value to be found in it. It’s not inflexible, and is more of an aid than a rule. Essentially, classification describes typefaces it does not define them. The impossibility of a truly complete classification system has led many people to dismiss any attempt to classify typefaces - there are simply too many variables to make anything close to a practical, comprehensive system. Most are generally believed to be subjective and incomplete, and many of them use the same terms for similar but slightly different classes. Over the past century, quite a few classification systems have been proposed. Most importantly, perhaps, this article will not only familiarize you with general type history and commonly used terminology, but also help you learn to look for and recognize important characteristics of type and the inexhaustible minutiae that make typefaces unique, as well as arm you with useful descriptors of type styles. In some cases, by finding enough disparity in the small features, very different typefaces become complementary. Type classification is also helpful in pairing typefaces for projects, sometimes based on historical proximity but also by noting similar features that unify the typefaces, such as axis or x-height. It’s not exclusively about the history of type, however. It really comes down to solid design choices.Ī good grasp of type history will help you avoid typographic anachronisms, which, although often lost on the general public, do not escape the notice of many designers, as demonstrated in Mark Simonson’s article on the 2012 Oscar winner for Best Picture, “The Artist,” and his other typographic scrutinies of popular movies and media. That being said, what you’ll read here is by no means impractical. More importantly, perhaps, there is a way in which seemingly impractical knowledge of one’s profession lends more credence to the designer. Accessibility: Arial is considered accessible for many audiences.There’s a certain intellectual delight in knowledge, particularly knowledge about one’s field of work and study.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |